Difference between revisions of "Sound workflow"
From Drafts
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* a box to take notes about the content | * a box to take notes about the content | ||
* possibility to make a quality control once it is included in the database: VIEW PROBLEM | REPORT PROBLEM | PROBLEM SOLVED | * possibility to make a quality control once it is included in the database: VIEW PROBLEM | REPORT PROBLEM | PROBLEM SOLVED | ||
| + | * let's not forget about a box for license | ||
| + | * do we need an interface for sound of our own or do we need to use radioswap instead? | ||
Latest revision as of 08:46, 28 March 2006
Notes from a discussion with Wendy
Audio web interface is not only useful to store+display the data but also to help prepar the archiving
- an interface to take notes about the sounds themselves(if we acquire them from a tape, remarks about their quality, which part of the document is in good shape, useful or not, etc)
- where the physical device is stored(the tape is at Wendy's place, the CD is at Sebastien's, etc) and when
- who borrows it and when
- where is the digitalised document sits(in the computer in the basement, on Pierre's laptop, etc) and when
- a box to take notes about the content
- possibility to make a quality control once it is included in the database: VIEW PROBLEM | REPORT PROBLEM | PROBLEM SOLVED
- let's not forget about a box for license
- do we need an interface for sound of our own or do we need to use radioswap instead?
